Transformasi Pendidikan Calon Guru Biologi: Integrasi Berpikir Reflektif dan Kolaboratif dalam Pengembangan Profesionalisme

Authors

  • Yuswa Istikomayanti Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi
  • Rudiyanto Rudiyanto SMP Sri Wedari Kota Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v17i2.4640

Keywords:

Transformasi; Implikasi; Kolaboratif

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini mendeskripsikan penerapan keterampilan berpikir reflektif dan kolaboratif untuk calon guru. Transformasi pendidikan khususnya pada pendidikan calon guru Biologi tidak hanya sebatas penguasaan materi dan pedagogik. Transformasi yang dilakukan melalui pengembangan kapasitas mahasiswa calon guru dalam mengasah cara pandang dalam sebuah pembelajaran melalui observasi. Tahapan ini dilalui pada tahun kedua dan tahun ketiga sehingga pada akhir masa studi mahasiswa calon guru memperoleh kecakapan sebagai pebelajar yang reflektif dan juga mampu berkolaborasi. Pendataan ini dilaksanakan pada mahasiswa PLP (Pengenalan Lapangan Persekolahan) sebanyak lima orang di salah satu sekolah swasta SMP Sri Wedari Malang. Kolaborasi dilaksanakan sesame sejawat mahasiswa, berkolaborasi dengan guru pamong dan juga terhadap siswa. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan dalam setiap tahun pembelajaran, mahasiswa calon guru mampu belajar secara sadar dan bermetakognitif dalam proses pengembangan dirinya sebagai tahapan proses yang dinamis. Implikasi dari penelitian ini memberikan pentingnya penguatan kapasitas pedagogik, kepribadian, sosial dan professional melalui praktik-praktik langsung yang dengan mudah memberikan pengalaman konstruktif bagi calon guru.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Suratno and S. Iskandar, “Teacher reflection in Indonesia: Lessons learnt from a lesson study program,” US-China Educ. Rev., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 39–48, 2010.

N. N. S. P. Verawati, Hikmawati, S. Prayogi, and M. R. Bilad, “Reflective Practices in Inquiry Learning: Its Effectiveness in Training Pre-Service Teachers’ Critical Thinking Viewed From Cognitive Styles,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 505–514, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v10i4.31814.

Z. Bührer, C. Bieri Buschor, S. Berweger, A. Keck Frei, and C. Wolfgramm, “Supporting early career teachers’ self-regulation and goal pursuit through online coaching during a professional development programme,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2024.2382820.

Santoso minto, “Penerapan Metode Teka-Teki Petualang Untukmeningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pgsd Semester Vi Universitas Islam Balitar Blitar Pada Mata Kuliah Pembelajaran Pkn Sd Tahun Akademik 2016/ 2017,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 200–209, 2017.

M. M. Al-Amien and E. Hasanah, “Analisis Kemampuan Guru dalam Penggunaaan Teknologi untuk Pembelajaran di SMK,” Konstruktivisme, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2442–2355, 2023, doi: 10.35457/konstruk.v15i1.2164.

E. F. Prastikawati, M. A. Adeoye, and J. C. Ryan, “Fostering Effective Teaching Practices: Integrating Formative Assessment and Mentorship in Indonesian Preservice Teacher Education,” Indones. J. Learn. Adv. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 230–253, 2024, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v6i2.23431.

M. Ulvik, V. Stokker Jensen, and L. Eide, “Student teachers’ online sharing of challenging incidents in practice placement,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 639–653, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2021.1985457.

S. Hase and C. Kenyon, “Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory,” Complicity An Int. J. Complex. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2007, doi: 10.29173/cmplct8766.

S. Hase and C. Kenyon, “Heutagogy and developing capable people and capable workplaces : strategies for dealing with complexity,” Proc. Chang. Face Work Learn. Conf., no. November, pp. 1–7, 2003, [Online]. Available: http://epubs.scu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1123&context=gcm_pubs.

A. J. Sebesta and E. B. Speth, “How should i study for the exam? Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in introductory biology,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-09-0269.

S. Hase and S. Hase, “Graduate College of Management Papers Moving from andragogy to heutagogy : implications for VET,” Proc. Res. to Real. Putt. VET Res. to Work Aust. Vocat. Educ. Train. Res. Assoc., no. January 2001, 2001.

Istikomayanti, Yuswa; Lathifah A.S.; Mitasari Z., “Collegiality as a Key for Improving Students Success in Lesson Study Practices,” Int. Conf. Math. Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 184–196, 2019.

Y. Istikomayanti and E. M. S. Wijaya, “Grup Kritis Membangun TPACK Calon Guru di Masa Pandemi,” J. Phys. Sci. Learn., vol. 06, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24636917.

E. Saito, I. Harun, I. Kuboki, and H. Tachibana, “Indonesian lesson study in practice: Case study of indonesian mathematics and science teacher education project,” J. In-Service Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 2006, doi: 10.1080/13674580600650872.

Y. D. Astuti and N. A. Drajati, “Teaching Practicum Experiences: Pre-service English Teachers’ Self-Reflections of Their Professional Growth,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 382–389, 2022, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.122.

V. T. Nguyen, T. C. Nguyen, and B. N. Ho, “Using lesson study for teacher development: A case study of Vietnamese EFL teachers’ reflections,” CTU J. Innov. Sustain. Dev., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 72–80, 2023, doi: 10.22144/ctujoisd.2023.052.

R. F. Dam and Y. S. Teo, “What is Design Thinking and Why Is It So Popular?,” Interact. Des. Found., pp. 1–6, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular.

J. C. Tu, L. X. Liu, and K. Y. Wu, “Study on the learning effectiveness of stanford design thinking in integrated design education,” Sustain., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1–21, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10082649.

L. Ketonen, M. Körkkö, and S. Pöysä, “Authentic assessment as a support for student teachers’ reflection,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2023.2229004.

P. Novita, “What Happened to Initial Teacher Education in Indonesia? AReview of the Literature,” Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 88, 2019, doi: 10.26417/ejser.v6i3.p88-103.

M. Sutomo and E. S. Siregar, “Teacher Professional Development in Indonesia’s Remote Areas with Driven Educational Philanthropic Institutions,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 500–509, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v6i3.55742.

E. Saito, T. D. H. Khong, A. Hidayat, S. Hendayana, and H. Imansyah, “Typologies of lesson study coordination: a comparative institutional analysis,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 65–81, 2020, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1561495.

Published

2025-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles

Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/ejournal.unisbablitar.ac.id/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.php on line 68

How to Cite

Transformasi Pendidikan Calon Guru Biologi: Integrasi Berpikir Reflektif dan Kolaboratif dalam Pengembangan Profesionalisme. (2025). Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 17(2), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v17i2.4640

Similar Articles

1-10 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.