Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Kawasan Industri
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis motivasi belajar sains serta perbedaannya antara siswa kelas VII dan VIII di Madrasah Tsanawiyah BPHBPI Kayu Aro, Kerinci, yang terletak di kawasan industri. Motivasi belajar dipandang sebagai faktor kunci yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan akademik siswa. Data penelitian dikumpulkan menggunakan kuesioner yang mengukur empat indikator utama motivasi belajar, yaitu learning goal orientation, task value, self-efficacy, dan self-regulation. Analisis menggunakan independent sample t-test menunjukkan adanya perbedaan signifikan pada semua indikator motivasi. Perbedaan rata-rata terbesar ditemukan pada task value (0.30) dan self-regulation (0.30). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa kelas VII memiliki motivasi belajar yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa kelas VIII. Penurunan motivasi belajar ini mengindikasikan adanya tantangan dalam mempertahankan motivasi seiring dengan bertambahnya tingkat kelas. Temuan ini memiliki implikasi penting dalam pendidikan IPA, di mana motivasi belajar berperan krusial dalam mencapai tujuan pembelajaran yang optimal. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan intervensi pedagogis yang inovatif dan relevan untuk mempertahankan serta meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa.
Downloads
References
R. E. Mayer, Applying the Science of Learning. Pearson, 2011.
J. S. Krajcik and C. M. Czerniak, Teaching and Learning Elementary and Middle School: A Project-Based Learning Approach, 5th ed. New York: Routledge, 2018.
Junarti, E. Enawaty, and R. P. Sartika, “Deskripsi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Perubahan Kimia dan Fisika di Kelas VII SMP,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/psnp/article/download/107-114/1717
A. Sunarsih, S. Sukarmin, and W. Sunarno, “The impact of natural science contextual teaching through project method to students’ achievement in MTsN Miri Sragen,” Int. J. Sci. Appl. Sci. Conf. Ser., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 45, 2017, doi: 10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16676.
J. Jurahmin, “Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar IPA Dengan Menerapkan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Di MTs Negeri Kota Batam,” Sci. J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat. dan IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 194–202, 2022, doi: 10.51878/science.v2i2.1265.
L. Dewi and Sumilah, “Hubungan Minat dan Motivasi dengan Hasil Belajar IPA Kelas V,” Joyf. Learn. J., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 176–182, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jlj/article/view/15207
O. D. Pranata and S. Seprianto, “Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Melalui Skema Blended learning Menggunakan Lembar Kerja Berbasis Simulasi,” Karst J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Ter., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v6i1.1724.
D. H. Putri and O. D. Pranata, “Eksplorasi Kejenuhan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains Setelah Pandemi,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 62–70, 2023, doi: 10.37729/jips.v4i2.3367.
K. Williams and C. Williams, “Five key ingredients for improving student motivation,” Res High Educ J, vol. 12, pp. 1–23, 2011.
D. R. Simanjuntak, M. N. Ritonga, and M. S. Harahap, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Secar Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” Math. Educ. Journal)MathEdu, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 142–146, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/
M. Monika and A. Adman, “Peran Efikasi Diri Dan Motivasi Belajar Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan,” J. Pendidik. Manaj. Perkantoran, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 109, 2017, doi: 10.17509/jpm.v2i2.8111.
D. Hermiati, O. D. Pranata, and H. Lardiman, “Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Sains : Studi Komparasi Pada Tiga Sekolah,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.1.17-26.
E. Samsudin, “Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa (Survey Pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Smp) Negeri Di Kecamatan Telagasari – Karawang),” Biodidaktika, J. Biol. Dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2019, doi: 10.30870/biodidaktika.v14i1.4841.
H. L. Tuan, C. C. Chin, and S. H. Shieh, “The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 639–654, 2005, doi: 10.1080/0950069042000323737.
S. Velayutham and J. M. Aldridge, “Influence of Psychosocial Classroom Environment on Students’ Motivation and Self-Regulation in Science Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 507–527, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9273-y.
O. D. Pranata, E. Sastria, D. Ferry, and D. R. Y. Zebua, “Analysis of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Their Relationship with Academic Achievement in Science,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science and Education, Atlantis Press SARL, 2023, pp. 395–410. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-142-5.
E. Satrianti, O. D. Pranata, and T. Tiara, “Science Learning Motivation Among Students at Junior and Senior High Schools in Sungai Penuh : A Comparative Study,” J. Pijar MIPA, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6101.
W. Wulandari and O. D. Pranata, “Analisis Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains,” Diksains J. Ilm. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 124–133, 2023, doi: 10.33369/diksains.3.2.124-133.
S. Mariyanti, “Model Goal Orientation Sebagai Efek dari Persepsi Quality Of School Life Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Prestasi Mahasiswa Psikologi,” J. Psikol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 57–64, 2015, [Online]. Available: www.esaunggul.ac.id
A. Rizky, “Pengaruh Orientasi Pembelajaran Dan Konsepsi Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Tahun Pertama,” J. Psikol. Talent., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8, 2020, doi: 10.26858/talenta.v5i1.8351.
A. L. Miller, K. T. Fassett, and D. L. Palmer, “Achievement goal orientation: A predictor of student engagement in higher education,” Motiv. Emot., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 327–344, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11031-021-09881-7.
E. Satriya, “Korelasi Antara Task Value (Nilai Tugas) Siswa Dengan Nilai Ulangan Harian,” J. Ilm. Aquinas, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 133–140, 2021, doi: 10.54367/aquinas.v4i1.1044.
M. Bong, “Academic Motivation in Self-Efficacy, Task Value, Achievement Goal Orientations, and Attributional Beliefs,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 287–298, 2004, doi: 10.3200/JOER.97.6.287-298.
A. L. Putri, O. D. Pranata, and E. Sastria, “Students Perception of Science and Technology in Science Learning: A Gender Comparative Study,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 44–50, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6153.
M. Z. M. B. Paul R Pintrich, “The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning,” Handb. Self-Regulation, pp. 451–502, 2000, [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780121098902500433
B. J. Zimmerman, “Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview,” Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2002, doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
D. Saputri, A. Ilyas, and Z. Ardi, “The Relationship of Self Regulation with Academic Procrastination of Students,” J. Neo Konseling, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.24036/00290kons2020.
G. Schraw, K. J. Crippen, and K. Hartley, “Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1–2, pp. 111–139, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8.
T. T. Sari, “Self-Efficacy dan Dukungan Keluarga Dalam Keberhasilan Belajar Dari Rumah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” Educ. J. J. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2020, doi: 10.31537/ej.v4i2.346.
A. Subaidi, “Self-Efficacy Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 64–68, 2016.
G. A. Morgan, N. L. Leech, G. W. Gloeckner, and K. C. Barret, SPSS for Introductory Statistics. Use and Interpretation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All, 2004.
N. L. Leech, K. C. Barret, and G. A. Morgan, SPSS for Intermediate Statistics. Use and Interpretation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All, 2005.
M. Elvianasti, L. Lufri, A. Andromeda, F. Mufit, P. Pramudiani, and L. Safahi, “Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa IPA: Studi Metaanalisis,” Edukasi J. Pendidik., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2022, doi: 10.31571/edukasi.v20i1.3582.
M. Bugler, S. McGeown, and H. St Clair-Thompson, “An investigation of gender and age differences in academic motivation and classroom behaviour in adolescents,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1193–1215, 2016, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1035697.
O. D. Pranata, “Penerapan Puzzle-Based Learning untuk Mengajar Matematika dan Sains di Pasantren dengan Kelas Heterogen,” J. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. UNSIQ, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 109–115, 2023.
N. Falkner, R. Sooriamurthi, and Z. Michalewicz, “Teaching puzzle-based learning: development of transferable skills,” Teach. Math. Comput. Sci., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 245–268, 2012, doi: 10.5485/tmcs.2012.0304.
Z. Michalewicz and N. Falkner, “Puzzle-based learning: An introduction to critical thinking and problem solving,” Decis. Line, pp. 6–9, 2011.
O. D. Pranata, “Penerapan Game-Based Learning Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Mengajar di Kelas Heterogen,” J. Pengabdi. Al-Ikhlas, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 337–350, 2023.
M. Qian and K. R. Clark, “Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 63, pp. 50–58, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023.
J. C. Huizenga, G. T. M. ten Dam, J. M. Voogt, and W. F. Admiraal, “Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 110, no. December, pp. 105–115, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.008.
O. D. Pranata, P. D. Sundari, and D. Sulaiman, “Exploring Project-Based Learning : Physics E-Posters in Pre- Service Science Education,” KONSTAN (Jurnal Fis. dan Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v8i02.387.
O. D. Pranata, S. Seprianto, I. Adelia, and S. R. Darwata, “Sosialisasi Integrasi Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran Sains Menggunakan Physics Education Technology (PhET),” J. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. UNSIQ, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 107–114, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.32699/ppkm.v11i2.6707.
N. H. Jariatin, P. D. A. Putra, and I. Wicaksono, “The influence of probing prompting learning model on junior high school critical thinking skills in science subjects,” Cahaya Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2024, doi: 10.33373/chypend.v10i1.6153.
R. M. Rizki, O. D. Pranata, and L. Angela, “Analisis Konsentrasi Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi : Studi Deskriptif dan Komparatif,” ORYZA J. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.33627/oz.v13i1.1806.
Heliyana Zuriyati, “Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Probing-Prompting Pada Materi Sistem Gerak Kelas Xi Ipa The Improvement Effort Of Student Learning Outcomes Through Probing- Prompting Learning Models On Motion System Material In El,” Cahaya Pendidikan, Vol 8 No 1 12-23, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2022.
A. D. Liem, S. Lau, and Y. Nie, “The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 486–512, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001.
Copyright (c) 2025 Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
