Restorative Justice Tindak Pidana “Elopement” Hukum Adat dalam Konstruksi Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia
Abstract views: 324
,
PDF downloads: 401
Abstract
This study examines the applicability of “elopement” customary law (“elopement”) in the construction of criminal law in Indonesia. This legal-system study uses a socio-legal methodology with the research locus in Mataram Marga Village, Sukadana District, East Lampung; Sade Village, Central Lombok, NTB; and Tenganan Karangasem Bali, with three findings. First, customary law (legal-culture) in determining the meaning and meaning of adult (legal and legitimate) is different from the meaning of adult according to positive law (Civil Code, Criminal Code and Law 1/1974). Second, the legal-structure of positive criminal law is superior to customary law or living-law (tradition) in the construction of restorative-justice through "elopement" legal events. Third, the norms of positive criminal law substance (legal-substance) Article 322 paragraph (1) number 2 of the Criminal Code which provides sanctions for imprisonment are more legitimate than customary law norms that provide social sanctions through traditional ceremonies. Article 322 paragraph (1) number 2 of the Criminal Code and Law 1/1974 have basically fulfilled the principles of establishing laws and regulations although they have not fully translated the principles of restorative justice. The ratio-legal restorative justice “elopement” of Indonesian customary law in the construction of the Criminal Code and Law 1/1974 is different but the legal relationship is quite harmonious. The main obstacle to the application of the principle of restorative justice in the settlement of criminal acts of "elopement" according to the construction of national law is the difficulty of mapping the standards of restorative justice benchmarks for customary law which are very diverse. Future arrangements for restorative justice "elopement" in the construction of national criminal law must follow the principle of receptio in complexio as legal politics in the regulation of national legal pluralism.
Downloads
References
A.S., Beni. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Ali, Mahrus. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Amruddin & Asikin, Zainal. (2004). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Chazawi, Adami. (2001). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Gangga Sitha Dewi, D. A. (2020). Kontroversi Perzinahan di Mata Agama dan Hukum yang Berlaku di Indonesia dengan Fakta Lapangan. Jurnal Supremasi, 10(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v10i1.862
H.S., Salim & Nurbani, Erlies Septiana. (2016). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis. Buku Ketiga, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hadikusuma, Hilman. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Adat Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Hamzah, Andi. (1994). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. (2009). Menyoal Penegakan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, PUSAKO Universitas Andalas, 2 (2), 57.
Irawan, P. (2007). Logika dan Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: STIA-Press.
Kaelan. (2010). Pendidikan Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.
Koentjaraningrat. (2010). Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Jambatan.
Marpaung, Leden. (2005). Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (1999). Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muladi & Arief, Barda Nawawi. (1992). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Muladi. (1995). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbitan Universitas Diponegoro.
P. Irawan, dkk. (2006). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. Jakarta : STIA LAN Press.
Pide, Suriyaman Masturi. (2014). Hukum Adat Dahulu, Kini, dan Akan Datang. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
Prasetyo, Teguh & Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. (2005). Politik Hukum Pidana (Kajian Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dan Drekriminasisasi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Setiady, Tolib. (2009). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Soekanto, Soerjono & Mamudji, Sri. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soekanto, Soerjono. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suarda, I. G. W. (2016). Kriminalisasi dalam UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana. Jurnal Supremasi, 6(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v6i2.393
Sunggono, Bambang. (2006). Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Utrecht, E. (1986). Hukum Pidana I. Surabaya: Pustakan Tinta Mas.
Warassih, Esmi. (2005). Pranata Hukum Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis. Semarang: PT. Suryandaru Utama.
Wulansari, C. Dewi. (2010). Hukum Adat Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Supremasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
