PERBEDAAN MODEL KANDANG LITTER DAN RAK PADA SISTEM KANDANG CLOSE HOUSE TERHADAP PERFORMAN AYAM BROILER DI EGI FARM KABUPATEN BLITAR

  • Saputra Universitas Islam Balitar
  • Esti Universitas Islam Balitar
  • Rahmawati Universitas Islam Balitar
Abstract views: 495 , PDF downloads: 0
Keywords: Broiler Chickens, Cage Models, Broiler Chicken Performance

Abstract

The structure of the cage system is one of the factors determining the comfort of broiler chickens when reared. So it is necessary to pay attention to the cage model that is built appropriately to obtain optimal broiler chicken performance. This research aims to test and analyze the effectiveness of the performance of broiler chickens kept in rack and litter cage models. This research was carried out at Egi Farm, Blitar Regency, using 2 different cage models, namely rack and litter cage models. Data were analyzed using the Independent samples T-test. The parameters taken in this study were feed consumtion, body weight gain (PBB), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality. The research results showed that the use of 2 different cage models, namely the rack and litter cage models, had an influence on feed consumption, body weight gain, feed conversion and mortality. The rack cage model obtained better chicken performance results with an average value of feed consumption during rearing of 1072.67 grams/head, a body weight gain value of 56.59 grams/head and an FCR value of 1.39. Meanwhile, litter cages had an average feed consumption value of 1017.45 grams/head, body weight gain of 50.67 grams/head and FCR value of 1.47. The rack cage model has a lower mortality rate than the litter cage model. Broiler chickens reared in rack style cages performed better compared to litter model cages

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andhini, A. N., Ramadhanintyas, K. N., & Abidin, Z. (2022). Hubungan Keberadaan Kandang Ayam dengan Kepadatan Lalat di Kecamatan Kawedanan Magetan. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(9), 3515-3519.
Ayubratman, A., Sunaryo, S., & Wadjdi, F. (2023). Pengaruh Pemberian Feed Aditive Tepung Bawang Dayak (Elutherine Bulbosa) pada Pakan Terhadap Performans Broiler. Dinamika Rekasatwa: Jurnal Ilmiah (e-Journal), 6(2).
Girsang, A., & Setianto, N. (2023). Mortalitas, Berat Panen, dan Feed Conversion Ratio pada Usaha Ayam Broiler PT. Cemerlang Unggas Lestari. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Hewani, 2(1), 09-21.
Irwan, F., Wattiheluw, M. J., & Tulalessy, A. H. (2022). Performa Broiler Yang Dipelihara Pada Kandang Panggung Dan Postal Double Deck Dengan Sistem Close House. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(12), 17036-17052.
Kasse, A. S., Lisnahan, C. V., & Nahak, O. R. (2021). Pengaruh pemberian tepung kunyit yang dicampur dalam air minum terhadap pertambahan bobot badan, konsumsi pakan, dan konversi pakan ayam broiler. JAS, 6(4), 69-71.
Laili, A. R., Damayanti, R., Setiawan, B., & Hidanah, S. (2022). Comparison of broiler performance in closed house and open house systems in trenggalek. Journal of Applied Veterinary Science and Technology, 3(1), 6-11.
Magdalena, R., & Krisanti, M. A. (2019). Analisis penyebab dan solusi rekonsiliasi finished goods menggunakan hipotesis statistik dengan metode pengujian independent sample t-test di pt. merck, tbk. Jurnal Tekno, 16(2), 35-48.
Putra, M., Sukanata, I., & Wirapartha, M. (2021). Analysis of Production Performance and Financial Viability of a Broiler Chicken Farming Business in A Closed House System (Case Study at Ud. Pande in Pejeng Village, Tampaksiring Sub-district, Gianyar District). Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan, 24(3), 105-109.
Suasta, I. M., Mahardika, I. G., & Sudiastra, I. W. (2019). Evaluasi produksi ayam broiler yang dipelihara dengan sistem closed house. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan, 22(1), 21-24.
Supartini, N. (2022). Kajian Performa Produksi Ayam Pedaging Pada Sistem Kandang Close House Dan Open House. AGRIEKSTENSIA: Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pertanian, 21(1), 42-50.
Susanti, E. D., Dahlan, M., & Wahyuning, D. (2016). Perbandingan produktivitas ayam broiler terhadap sistem kandang terbuka (open house) dan kandang tertutup (closed house) di UD Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Sumber rejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ternak, 7(1).

PlumX Metrics

Published
2024-07-29
How to Cite
Saputra, F. A. S., Esti, R. N., & Rahmawati, R. Y. (2024). PERBEDAAN MODEL KANDANG LITTER DAN RAK PADA SISTEM KANDANG CLOSE HOUSE TERHADAP PERFORMAN AYAM BROILER DI EGI FARM KABUPATEN BLITAR. AVES: Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan, 18(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.35457/aves.v18i1.3759
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>