Analisis Kritis Terhadap Penerapan Presidential Threshold dalam Pemilihan Umum 2024: Perspektif Hukum Normatif di Indonesia
Abstract
The minimum requirements for presidential and vice presidential nominations (presidential threshold) in Indonesia ahead of the 2024 General Election (Pemilu) continue to be a source of debate in the context of Constitutional Law. This debate arose due to factors such as allegations that the previous regime which won the election wanted to ensure its position as the determinant of presidential candidates in the next election. Through normative legal research methods, research was produced that this threshold was applied to the 2019 Election through Article 222 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. This article stipulates that candidate pairs must be proposed by political parties or combinations of political parties participating in the election that succeeded in winning at least 20% of the total seats in the House of Representatives or 25% of the valid national votes in the previous election. This has the potential for the emergence of transactional politics in the formation of political party coalitions that are not based on shared ideology. Empirical facts and experience from the last election show that due to the presidential nomination threshold, the 2019 election produced the same two pairs of candidates as the 2014 election. This indicates that the implementation of the presidential threshold effectively eliminates competitors or potential challengers in the presidential and vice presidential elections, violating the general election principles of honesty and fairness. If this threshold remains, it is likely that the threshold for presidential and vice presidential candidacy will become even higher in the future, strengthening the dominance of transactional politics.
Downloads
References
A, Sy OZaman. “Is the Presidential Premium Spurious?” Journal of Empirical Finance 56 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.01.001.
Abdul Hakam Sholahuddin, Anik Iftitah, Uun Dewi Mahmudah. “Pelaksanaan Pasal 280 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.” Jurnal Supremasi 9, No. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v9i2.793.
Adkha, Takhasasu. “Urgensi Presidential Threshold dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia,” 2019, 175–88.
Ali, Fawzi, Akbar Rasfanjani, and Tri Suhendra Arbani. “Problematika Sistem Presidential Threshold dalam Perspektif Sistem Presidensial di Indonesia” 5, No. 1 (2023): 24–32.
Artikel, Abstrak, Kata Kunci, and Sistem Presidensiil. “Anomali Presidential Threshold” 4, No. 3 (n.d.): 303–16.
Azani, Andre. “Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 17, No. 2 (2021): 170–80.
Elok, Andina, and Puri Maharani. Hukum Parta Politik dan Sistem Pemilu, n.d.
Fitri, Alfa, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan, and Nasional Veteran. “Presidential Threshold dalam Pemilihan Umum Serentak: Kemunduran Demokrasi Konstitusional ?,” n.d., 68–82.
Huda, Uu Nurul. Hukum Partai Politik dan Pemilu di Indonesia. Bandung: Fokusmedia, 2018.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publising, 2011.
Iftitah, Anik, ed. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mei 2023. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.
Iftitah, Anik, et al. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.
Minan, Ahsanul. “Perihal Penegakan Hukum Pemilu,” 2019.
Nopit Ernasari, Devi Rakhmatika. “Dampak Penerapan Presidential Threshold Terhadap Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam Sistem Pemilu di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Specialis 2, No. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/jlsp/index.
Perdana, M. Taufan, Moh. Alfaris, and Anik Iftitah. 2020. “Kewenangan Bawaslu dalam Pilkada 2020 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 48/PUU-XVII/2019”. Jurnal Supremasi 10 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v10i1.940.Pratama, Rizky, Program Studi, Hukum Keluarga, and Fakultas Syariah. “Abadinya Persoalan Presidential Threshold di Meja Mahkamah Konstitusi” 2, No. 1 (2023): 22–26.
Presiden, Wakil. “Meninjau Ulang Ketentuan Presidential Threshold,” March (2021): 49–74.
Putusan, Kajian, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sholahuddin Al-fatih, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Muhammadiyah. “Akibat Hukum Regulasi tentang Threshold dalam Legal Impact of The Threshold Regulation,” No. 14 (2019).
Rafy, Muhammad, Edi Haskar, and Nessa Fajriyana Farda. “Penerapan Sistem Presidential Threshold dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia dalam Bentuk Pemerintahan Negara Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar” 1, No. 1 (2023): 75–88.
Ragil, Muhammad, Arighi Shunas, and Hj Siti Fatimah. “Dinamika Ambang Batas Presiden dalam Pemilu Serentak di Indonesia” 10, No. 3 (2022): 45–53.
Sjadzali, Munawir. Tata Negara, 2013.
UUPUU. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Sebagaimana Diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, 2011.
Vries., Bojana M. Dinić; Kimberley Breevaart; Wendy Andrews; Reinout E. de. “Voters’ HEXACO Personality Traits as Predictors of Their Presidential Leadership Style Preferences.” Personality and Individual Differences 202 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111994.
Wahyuni, Putri Lina, Elidar Sari, Fakultas Hukum, Program Studi, Hukum Unimal, Komplek Kampus, and Bukit Indah. “Presidential Threshold Terhadap Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan,” 2020, 38–58.
Warjiyati, Sri, and Sri Warjiyati. “Urgensi Presidential Threshold dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum Serentak di Indonesia,” 1945, 175–88.
Wijaya, Asep, and Poppilea Erwinta. “Problematika Hukum Penerapan Presidential Threshold dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia” 16, No. 2 (2020): 45–54.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Supremasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
