Analisis Yuridis Putusan Nomor 29/PDT.SUS-KPPU/2019/PN BLK Terkait Persekongkolan Tender
Abstract
Considering the objection to Decision Number 17/KPPU-I/2018 at the Bulukumba District Court which was carried out by business actors to declare null and void or at least cancel the decision Number 17/KPPU-I/2018 in its entirety, it is important to do research to find out the judge's consideration of the tender conspiracy case. Through normative legal research, it resulted that the judgments of the panel of judges in examining and deciding the case Decision Number 29/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2019/Pn Blk essentially strengthens and takes over all considerations of the ICC Commission Council Decision, however, the panel of judges then decided to reduce the fine from IDR 586,903,909 to IDR 800 million with the judgment that the sanctions imposed by the Respondent against the objected Petitioner have not fulfilled a sense of justice because it was considered too big/unequal compared to the level of the Petitioner's mistake, therefore it is necessary to give the Petitioner sanctions that are more corrective, preventive and educative.
Downloads
References
Adnyana, N., & Gusti, I. (2013). Upaya Hukum Keberatan dalam Penanganan Perkara Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 18(1), 95–104. http://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/jch/article/download/1114/768
Analysis, A., & Pdt, N. K. (2019). Kasus Persekongkolan Tender Jalan Nasional Imposing of Financial Penalties Against. 238, 197–214.
Asmah, A. (2019). Analisis Efektivitas Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Makassar No 15 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan Pemberdayaan Pasar Tradisional dan Penataan Pasar Modern. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, 7(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v7i2.7019
Asmah. (2017). Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Hakikat Fungsi KPPU di Indonesia (L. O. Husen (ed.)). CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2017. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Hukum_Persaingan_Usaha_Hakikat_Fungsi_KP.html?id=tGudDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Bakti, S., Asikin, Z., & Sahnan, S. (2020). Eksistensi Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dalam Penanganan Persekongkolan Tender Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 3(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v3i2.1953
Johan, S. (2022). Sanksi Administratif Denda Pendekatan Laporan Keuangan Atas Pelanggaran Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.20-28
Jusmadi, R. (2014). Konsep Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Sejarah, Kaidah Perdagangan Bebas dan Pengaturan Merger-Akuisisi. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=9534
Lubis, A. F. (2009). Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks & Konteks. GTZ. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL25116645M/Hukum_persaingan_usaha
Marbun, R. (2010). Persekongkolan Tender Barang/Jasa (B. Seda (ed.)). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia. http://opac.balikpapan.go.id:8123/inlislite3/opac/detail-opac?id=7878
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Rokan, M. K. (2010). Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Rajawali Press. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=712495
Susmayanti, R. (2019). Analisis Putusan tentang Gugatan Wanprestasi terhadap Pengingkaran Janji Kampanye oleh Presiden Terpilih. Jurnal Supremasi, 9(1), 39-50.
Wibowo, S. (2021). Tender Conspiracy In Electronic Procurement Of Goods And Services (A Study Of Case Number 04/KPPU-L/2015). https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol3.iss1.art4
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Supremasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
