Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Angsuran Leasing (Studi Putusan Nomor 67/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Met)

  • Almaida Pubiana Mustika Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bandar Lampung
Abstract views: 87 , PDF downloads: 72
Keywords: Liability, Crime, Embezzlement, Leasing Installment

Abstract

The crime of embezzlement, which is regulated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, is a criminal offense that spans various sectors and is committed by various groups of society. Both low and high levels of society have the potential to commit this crime. One of the important issues is how to deal with the responsibility of the perpetrators of embezzlement of leasing installments. This research using the normative legal research method analyzes Decision Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN.Met and explored the basis for the judge's consideration in reaching a verdict in the case of embezzlement of leasing installment money. The results showed that in Decision Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN.Met, the perpetrator of the crime of embezzlement of leasing installment money was proven guilty and violated Article 372 of the Criminal Code. As a result, the perpetrator was sentenced to imprisonment for 1 year and 7 months. The judge's reasoning in this decision involved several factors, including the evidence presented, witness testimony, the testimony of the defendant, the indictment and charges of the public prosecutor, as well as the elements contained in the prosecutor's charges. In addition, the judge's consideration also included aggravating and mitigating aspects of the defendant's actions. The decision provides guidance on how the various elements of evidence and testimony can form the basis of the judge's reasoning in deciding this type of case. In addition, this research underscores the importance of a comprehensive understanding of criminal law and applicable legal principles to ensure fairness in handling similar cases in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami, Chazawi. Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda. Jakarta: Bayu Media, 2006.

Al., Larisa V.Gorbunova et. “Aggravating Circumstances, Significance and Correlation with Qualifying Signs.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Science 6, no. 3 (2015).

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI, 2012.

Billy Lanongbuka, Olga A. Pangkerego, Christine S. Tooy. “Wewenang Penuntut Umum Melakukan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Lex Crimen 9, No. 4 (2020).

D, Hananta. “Pertimbangan Keadaan-Keadaan Meringankan dan Memberatkan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 7, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/DOI : 10.25216/JHP.7.1.2018.87-108.

Gabriella Angelia Kodoati, Max Sepang, Eugenius N. Paransi. “Tindak Pidana Penggelapan di Bidang Perasuransian Menurut Undangundang Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian.” Lex Crimen 11, no. 1 (2022). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/download/38222/34922.

Hessick, Carissa Byrne. “Why Are Only Bad Acts Good Sentencing Factors?” Boston University Law Review 88, no. 5 (2008).

Husein, Imam Akbaru Al, and Anik Iftitah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Ranmor Dalam Perspektif Viktimologi.” Jurnal Supremasi 8, No. 1 (March 10, 2018): 5. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v8i1.399.

Juanda, Surya Oktarina dan. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Mobil yang Menjadi Jaminan Leasing Pada Lembaga Pembiayaan Ditinjau Dari Pasal 372 Dan Pasal 64 Ayat 1 KUHP” (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 345/Pid.b/2014/Pn.Dpk.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 3, no. 1 (2016).

KUHP. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (n.d.).

Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Cet-1. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Mullyadi, Lilik. Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

PN.Met. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Metro Nomor 67/Pid.B/2021/PN.Met (2021).

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2003.

Salinah. “Penerapan Asas Oportunitas dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Hukum Islam.” Lēgalitē. Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam 1, no. 1 (2016). https://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/legalite/article/download/292/184.

Satria, Farhan EdnurFarhan Ednur Satria, Chepi Ali Firman. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penggelapan Mobil Leasing Dihubungkan Dengan Pasal 372 KUHP Tentang Penggelapan.” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies 2, no. 2 (2022). https://proceedings.unisba.ac.id/index.php/BCSLS/article/download/4669/1623/.

Soesilo, M. K. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP): Dengan Penjelasan Resmi Dan Komentar. Bogor: Politeia, 2016.

UU Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (2009).

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-09-13
How to Cite
Pubiana Mustika, A. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Uang Angsuran Leasing (Studi Putusan Nomor 67/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Met). Jurnal Supremasi, 13(2), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i2.2283
Section
Articles