Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pelelangan Objek Hak Tanggungan (Putusan Nomor 23/PDT.G/2020/PN.KLA)

  • Veryantoyo Eka Yunanda Universitas Indonesia
  • Arman Nefi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
Abstract views: 163 , PDF downloads: 333
Keywords: Default, Unlawful Acts, Mortgage Object

Abstract

The auction for the execution of the mortgage right can be held by the creditor as the holder of the mortgage right for the defaulting debtor, but there are several important aspects in fulfilling a person who can be declared in default or not, this aims to avoid activities or conditions of illegal acts. This study discusses the consequences of an unlawful act in the auction of mortgage objects. In answering the problems in this research, a normative juridical approach is used with the type of analytical descriptive research and uses a qualitative data analysis method. The results of the analysis on the Kalianda District Court Decision No. 23/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Kla stated that there were circumstances that caused debts to be uncollectible immediately and all at once, paying attention to the unexpired term of the agreement is a determining aspect of whether a person can be declared in default and the value of the collateral that is greater than the debt causes the debtor to be in a position not yet eligible to be declared in default. An unlawful act is a determining aspect that can cancel the outcome of the execution of the mortgage due to violating the subjective rights of other people as the owner of the land object of the mortgage, because it violates the subjective rights of other people as the owner of the mortgage object land, causing losses to the debtor because the mortgage object is auctioned off or there is a causal relationship between the error and the loss suffered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dharmajaya, A. (2005). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Lelang Atas Tanah dan Bangunan yang Tidak Dapat Dimiliki oleh Pemenang Lelang: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 159 K / Pdt 2005 = Legal review on land and building unable to own by auction winner: An analysis on verdict of the. 189. Universitas Indonesia.

Dja’is, M. (2004). Pikiran Dasar Hukum Eksekusi. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Djumhana, M. (2003). Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia (Cet. 4). Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Fuady, M. (2005). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Pendekatan Kontemporer. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harsono, B. (2005). Hukum Agraria Indonesia : Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya (Cet. 10). Jakarta: Djambatan.

Indonesia, R. (2016). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia No 11/POJK.03/2016. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 1–82.

Indonesia. (1996). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.

Khalim, A. (2014). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Gugatan Pelaksanaan Lelang di KPKNL. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/5097/Perbuatan-Melawan-Hukum-dalam-Gugatan-Pelaksanaan-Lelang-di-KPKNL.html

Mamudji, S. (2005). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum (Cet. 1). Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia

Rifa’i, A., & Iftitah, A. (2018). BENTUK-BENTUK PELANGGARAN HUKUM DALAM PELAKSANAAN JABATAN NOTARIS. Jurnal Supremasi, 8(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v8i2.486

Rochmat Soemitro, H. (2003). Peraturan dan Instruksi Lelang. Bandung: Eressco.

Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (2006). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata: Burgelijk Wetboek (Cet. 37). Jakarta: PT. Balai Pustaka

Subekti. (2005). Hukum Perjanjian (Cet. 21). Jakarta: Intermasa.

Tobing, L. (2014). Perbedaan Droit de Preference dan Hak Privilege. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-droit-de-preference-dan-hak-privilege-lt547a9355c4b95

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-02-28
How to Cite
Veryantoyo Eka Yunanda, & Nefi, A. (2023). Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pelelangan Objek Hak Tanggungan (Putusan Nomor 23/PDT.G/2020/PN.KLA). Jurnal Supremasi, 13(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i1.2080
Section
Articles