ANALISIS PENDAPATAN DAN PERSEPSI PETANI TERHADAP KEMITRAAN USAHA KAMPUNG KUCAI DI KABUPATEN BLITAR
Abstract
This study aims to describe the agribusiness partnership process that takes place in Kampung Kucai, analyze the income of chives farming, and the perception of chives farmers on the partnership process in Garum District, Blitar Regency. This research uses a qualitative approach in the form of a case study. Informants in this study were partner chives farmers in Kampung Kucai. Determination of the sample of plasma partner farmers was carried out by purposive sampling method. Informants were selected based on secondary data from the core and information from farmers. So the sample used for Kucai Mitra farmers is 20 people. In addition, there are also 5 key informants. The methods of data collection carried out in this study are of several types, namely structured interviews, in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and documentation. The data analysis method used in this researchis descriptive analysis, income analysis, and Likert analysis. The results showed that the type of partnership between the Financial Institution "Bank BRI" and the partner chives farmers was classified as a nucleus-plasma partnership pattern. In the mechanism of the partnership pattern of the Financial Institution "BRI Bank" with the Kucai Farmer Group, it is carried out based on a partnership agreement. The agreement letter contains the identities of the two partnering parties and the rules given by "Bank BRI" as well as the location or planting area. The total income from chives farming is Rp. 242,000, -. The income of chives farming can be taken by women farmers once a month at the monthly member meeting in the Women Farmers Group or can be saved in advance. If they are saved, usually the women farmers in the research location will take the income before the Eid al-Fitr. The perception of partner chives farmers on the planning of partnership implementation is 80% or very good, the perception of partner chives farmers on the partnership process is 78% or quite good, and the perception of the evaluation of the partnership is very good with 85% results. So that the results of the Likert analysis on the average perception of partner chives farmers on the partnership process with financial institutions "Bank BRI" have a very good category with a percentage of 80% where the total score is 483.
Downloads
References
Ashari, 0S. 0T. 0 (2012). Potensi0dan Prospek0Pemanfaatan Lahan0Pekarangan Untuk0Mendukung0Ketahanan Pangan. 0Jakarta: 0Pusat Sosial0Ekonomi dan Kebijakan0Pertanian Press.
Bitzer, 0V., 0Glasbergen, 0P. and Arts, 0B., 02013. Exploring0the potential0of intersectoral0partnerships to0improve the0position of0farmers in0global agrifood0chains: findings0from the0coffee secto0 in0Peru. Agriculture0and Human0Values, 30(1). 0
Carter, 0W. 0K., &0Usry0 M. F.(2009). 0Akuntansi biaya.Jakarta: Salemba0Empat.
Dahniar, 0F. (2011). Hubungan0Antara Persepsi0Terhadap Word0Of0Mouth (Wom) Dengan0Intensi0Membeli 0Makanan Vegetarian0Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas0Psikologi Universitas0Diponegoro. Semarang : 0Universitas Diponegoro.
Dewi, 0M. A. R. (2012). Analisis0Efisiensi Teknis0Penggunaan0Faktor0Produksi Pada Usahatani0Jagung0 (Zea Mays)(Studi Kasus0Desa0Kramat, Kecamatan0Bangkalan, Kabupaten0Bangkalan, Madura) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas0Brawijaya).
Fahrudin, 0D. 0 (2010). Pola0Kemitraan0Antara PT. Bisi0Internasional, Tbk dengan0Petani0Buncis0di0Desa0Bendosari Kecamatan0Pujon Kabupaten Malang. 0Malang: Skripsi0Fakultas0Pertanian Universitas0Brawijaya.
Fitriza, 0Y. T., 0Haryadi, F. T., &0Syahlani, S. P. 0 (2012). Analisis0pendapatan dan0persepsi peternak0plasma terhadap0kontrak perjanjian0pola0kemitraan ayam0pedaging0di Propinsi0Lampung. Buletin0Peternakan, 36(1), 57-65.
Khairad, 0F. 0 (2020). Sektor0Pertanian di0Tengah0Pandemi COVID-190ditinjau Dari0Aspek Agribisnis. 0Jurnal0Agriuma, 2(2), 082-89.
Lestari0M. 02009. 0Analisis Pendapatan0dan0Tingkat0Kepuasan Peternak Plasma0Terhadap0Pelaksanaan Kemitraan0Ayam Broiler0 (Studi Kasus Kemitraan0PT. 0X di0Yogyakarta) (skripsi). Bogor: 0Fakultas Ekonomi0dan Manajemen, 0Institut0Pertanian0Bogor.
Musoleha, 0T., 0Hasanuddin, 0T., &0Listiana, I. 0 (2014). Persepsi0Masyarakat terhadap Program0Kemitraan dan0Bina Lingkungan0 (Pkbl) 0PTPN0VII Unit0Usaha Rejosari0Kecamatan Natar0Kabupaten0Lampung Selatan. Jurnal0Ilmu-Ilmu0Agribisnis, 02(4), 0390-398.
Paeru, 0R. H., Dewi, T. Q., 0Ahli, P., &0Sunarjono, H. H. 0 (2015). Panduan Praktis0Bertanam Sayuran0di0Pekarangan. Penebar0Swadaya0Grup.
Pintakami, 0L. B. (2018). Analisis0Kontribusi Gender0Dalam Budidaya0Tanaman Kucai Skala0Rumah Tangga0Di Lahan0Pekarangan. 0VIABEL: Jurnal Ilmiah 0Ilmu-Ilmu0Pertanian, 12(1), 27-48.
Pintakami, 0L.B., 0Yuliati, Y. and0Purnomo, M. 0 (2013). Keterlibatan0Perempuan Tani0Pada Program0Pengelolaan0Hutan Bersama Masyarakat0 (PHBM) Dalam0Rangka Mencapai0Kesejahteraan0Rumah Tangga0 (Studi Kasus0Di Desa0Bayem, Kecamatan0Kasembon, Kabupaten Malang). Indonesian0Journal0of Women's0Studies.
Ratih, 0A. (2011). Analisis0Pelaksanaan Kemitraan0Dalam Agroindustri0Apel Antara UD. 0Bagus Agriseta0Mandiri Dengan0Petani Apel0Di Desa Bumiaji, Kecamatan0Bumiaji, Kota0Wisata Batu0 (skripsi). Malang : Fakultas0Pertanian0Universitas0Brawijaya.
Santoso, 0P., Suryadi, A., Subagyo, H., & Latulung, B. V. (2014). Dampak teknologi0sistem usaha0pertanian padi0terhadap peningkatan0produksi dan pendapatan0usahatani di Jawa0Timur. Jurnal0Pengkajian dan Pengembangan0Teknologi0Pertanian, 8(1).
Setiawati, 0W., Murtiningsih, R., Sopha, G. A., & Handayani, T. (2007). Budidaya Tanaman0Sayuran. Balai0Penelitian Tanaman0Sayuran. 0Bandung.
Sina, 0P. G. (2020). Ekonomi0Rumah Tangga0Di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Management: Smal0 and Medium0Enterprises (SMEs), 12(2), 239-254.
Soekartawi, 0S. (2012). Beberapa Hal0Yang Perlu Diperhatikan0Dalam Melakukan0Analisis Sistem0Agroindustri Terpadu. Jurnal0Agribisnis dan Ekonomi0Pertanian, 1(2).
Soekartawi. 1999. Agribisnis (Teori & Aplikasinya). Jakarta. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutopo. (2018). Penentuan Jumlah Sampel dalam Penelitian. STIE Dharmaputra Semarang.
Wahyu, P. (2010). Studi Pola Kemitraan Usahatani Benih Jagung Pada CV. Riawan Tani Di Desa Sawentar Kecamatan Kanigoro Kabupaten Blitar (skripsi). Malang: Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya.
Wati, I. (2017). Analisis Biaya dan Pendapatan Usaha Tani dengan Sistem Kondomisasi pada Buah Kakao (Theobroma cacao. L)(Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Noling, Kecamatan Bupon, Kabupaten Luwu). Jurnal Pertanian Berkelanjutan, 3(3), 50-60.
Yulida, R. (2013). Kontribusi Usahatani Lahan Pekarangan terhadap Ekonomi Rumah Tangga Petani di Kecamatan Kerinci Kabupaten Pelalawan. IJAE (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Pertanian Indonesia), 3(2), pp.135-154.
Copyright (c) 2021 VIABEL: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
