The Effect of the RADEC Learning Model on Elementary School Students' Understanding of Science Concepts

Nina Maulidatun Fajariyah; Nanda William; Diyanti Jati  Pratiwi

doi:10.35457/6e1v3q55

Authors

Nina Maulidatun Fajariyah STKIP PGRI Trenggalek
Nanda William STKIP PGRI Trenggalek
Diyanti Jati Pratiwi STKIP PGRI Trenggalek

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35457/6e1v3q55

Keywords:

Biodiverssity, RADEC Model, Understanding of Science Concepts, elementary school

Abstract

Understanding science concepts is a crucial skill for elementary school students, enabling them to connect and apply these concepts to their daily lives. However, teacher-centered instruction has resulted in suboptimal student understanding of biodiversity concepts. This study aimed to determine the impact of the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) learning model on the science concept understanding of fifth-grade elementary students regarding biodiversity. A quantitative approach was employed using a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design. The study population consisted of fifth-grade elementary students during the 2025/2026 academic year. Data were collected via pre-tests and post-tests assessing concept understanding and analyzed using prerequisite tests, an independent sample t-test, and the N-Gain test. The results indicated that the data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The independent sample t-test on post-test scores yielded a significance value of 0.00 (p < 0.05), demonstrating a significant effect of the RADEC model on students' science concept understanding. This improvement was supported by an N-Gain score of 0.61 (medium category) and an effectiveness rate of 60.93% (moderately effective category). In conclusion, the RADEC learning model effectively enhances students' science concept understanding through a learning process that fosters independence, collaboration, and creativity. The study recommends the RADEC model as an innovative teaching strategy for elementary schools and suggests it serve as a reference for future researchers looking to adapt the model for different subject matter or educational levels.

References

Afif, Z., Azhari, D. S., Kustati, M., & Sepriyanti, N. (2023). Penelitian Ilmiah (Kuantitatif) Beserta Paradigma, Pendekatan, Asumsi Dasar, Karakteristik, Metode Analisis Data Dan Outputnya. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(3), 682-693.

Anantasia, G., & Rindrayani, S. R. (2025). Metodologi penelitian quasi eksperimen. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 3(1), 47-56.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Ed.). 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Andini, S. R., & Fitria, Y. (2021). Pengaruh model radec pada pembelajaran tematik terhadap hasil belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1435-1443.

Anisa, A. R., Ipungkarti, A. A., & Saffanah, K. N. (2021). Pengaruh kurangnya literasi serta kemampuan dalam berpikir kritis yang masih rendah dalam pendidikan di Indonesia. In Current research in education: conference series journal, 1(1) 1-12.

Apriani, W., Dewi, N. K., & Istiningsih, S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Kelas III SDN 3 Ketapang Raya. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(3), 46-50.

Frans, S. A., Ani, Y., & Wijaya, Y. A. (2023). Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Sekolah Dasar [Reading Comprehension Skills of Elementary” School” Students]. Diligentia: Journal of Theology and Christian Education, 5(1), 54-68.

Fuziani, I., Istianti, T., & Arifin, M. H. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran radec dalam merancang kegiatan pembelajaran keberagaman budaya di sd kelas iv. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 8319-8326

Jatnika, W. T., Sunaengsih, C., & Sujana, A. (2024). Penerapan model pembelajaran RADEC untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep pada materi sistem pernapasan manusia Siswa Kelas V SD. Academy of Education Journal, 15(2), 1183-1190.

Krathwohl, D. R., (2002): A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218

Nafiati, D., A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151-172

Nurmitasari, S., Banawi, A., & Riaddin, D. (2023). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran RADEC dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 7(2).

Nusnida, N. N., & Hidayat, T. (2025). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis PBL pada Materi IPA Keragaman Flora dan Fauna Indonesia Kelas V: Indonesia. JANACITTA, 8(2), 452-462.

Sihotang, H. (2023). Buku Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: UKI Press

Sopandi, W. (2017). the Quality Improvement of Learning Processes and Achievements Through the Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain-and. Dalam C. M. Keong, L.L. Hong, & R. Rao (Penyunting), Proceeding 8th Pedagogy International Seminar 2017, 8, 132–139. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Ilmu Khas

Ulfa, M., Oktaviana, E., & Hasanah, N. (2024). Penerapan Model Radec dan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dalam Meningkatan Keterampilan Literasi. PUSAKA: Journal of Educational Review, 1(2), 16-27.

Usmadi, U. (2020). Pengujian persyaratan analisis (Uji homogenitas dan uji normalitas). Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 50-62.

Widyanti, E., Hasanah, U., & Rohmadani, S. (2025). Evaluasi Strategi Guru Dalam Mengukur Capaian Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SDN 002 Sangatta Utara. Journal Of Holistic Education, 2(1), 1-15.

Zayrin, A. A., Nupus, H., Maizia, K. K., Marsela, S., Hidayatullah, R., & Harmonedi, H. (2025). Analisis Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan (Uji Validitas Dan Relibilitas Instrumen Penelitian). QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 3(2), 780-789.