JURIDICAL REVIEW RETURN OF PERSONAL PROPERTY PROPERTY AGAINST CONVICTED CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION
Abstract views: 55
,
pdf downloads: 35
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out what assets can be confiscated in criminal acts of corruption and to find out whether the confiscation of assets carried out by investigators against criminal acts of corruption is in accordance with the rule of law and what legal remedies can be taken to return these assets. In this study, the author uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study, it shows that property that is not the result or instrument of a criminal act of corruption cannot be confiscated unless the convict does not pay replacement money within 1 (one) month after the court decision that has obtained permanent legal force is read, the assets can be confiscated by the prosecutor. and auctioned to cover the replacement money and the confiscation should not be the property that is used as the defendant's livelihood. Legal remedies that can be taken for the convict if the investigator exceeds his authority in carrying out confiscation actions, pretrial legal remedies can be carried out at the investigation stage. Legal remedies for appeal, cassation and review can be carried out if the panel of judges has rendered a decision. A civil lawsuit can be filed if during the confiscation process it is known that assets that are not instruments or proceeds of a criminal act of corruption are also confiscated, causing material and immaterial losses to the plaintiff .
References
[2] Soebekti. 2001. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Internusa.
[3] Abdulkadir, Muhammad. 2010. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[4] Rosa, Silva Da. 2018. “Perlindungan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pelaksanaan Perampasan Aset Secara Tidak Wajar”. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Volume 2, Nomor 2.
[5] Sugandhi, R.1981. KUHP dan Penjelasannya. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
[6] Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchoen. 2000. Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
[7] Wibisono, Andreas. 2009. “Penilaian Judex Jurist Terhadap Putusan Bebas Murni Yang Dimohonkan Kasasi Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Korupsi Terdakwa ECW Noloe, Nurdin Halid, dan Fadillah Budiono)”, Skripsi, (Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia)
[8] Muljiono, Wahju. 2012. Teori dan Praktek Peradilan Perdata di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
[9] Sarwono. 2012. Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[10] Bintania Aris. 2012. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
[11] Mulyadi, Lilik. 2000. Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bandung: Alumni.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ivan Maulana, Waluyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
