JURIDICAL REVIEW RETURN OF PERSONAL PROPERTY PROPERTY AGAINST CONVICTED CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION

  • Ivan Maulana UPN veteran jawa timur
  • Waluyo UPN Veteran Jawa Timur
Abstract views: 63 , pdf downloads: 45
Keywords: confiscation, legal report, corruption crime

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out what assets can be confiscated in criminal acts of corruption and to find out whether the confiscation of assets carried out by investigators against criminal acts of corruption is in accordance with the rule of law and what legal remedies can be taken to return these assets. In this study, the author uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study, it shows that property that is not the result or instrument of a criminal act of corruption cannot be confiscated unless the convict does not pay replacement money within 1 (one) month after the court decision that has obtained permanent legal force is read, the assets can be confiscated by the prosecutor. and auctioned to cover the replacement money and the confiscation should not be the property that is used as the defendant's livelihood. Legal remedies that can be taken for the convict if the investigator exceeds his authority in carrying out confiscation actions, pretrial legal remedies can be carried out at the investigation stage. Legal remedies for appeal, cassation and review can be carried out if the panel of judges has rendered a decision. A civil lawsuit can be filed if during the confiscation process it is known that assets that are not instruments or proceeds of a criminal act of corruption are also confiscated, causing material and immaterial losses to the plaintiff .

References

[1] Djokorda, Istri Agung dan I Gusti Ngurah Parwata. 2020 Harta Benda Yang Dapat Disita Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Volume 9 Nomor 10.
[2] Soebekti. 2001. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Internusa.
[3] Abdulkadir, Muhammad. 2010. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[4] Rosa, Silva Da. 2018. “Perlindungan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pelaksanaan Perampasan Aset Secara Tidak Wajar”. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Volume 2, Nomor 2.
[5] Sugandhi, R.1981. KUHP dan Penjelasannya. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
[6] Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchoen. 2000. Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
[7] Wibisono, Andreas. 2009. “Penilaian Judex Jurist Terhadap Putusan Bebas Murni Yang Dimohonkan Kasasi Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Korupsi Terdakwa ECW Noloe, Nurdin Halid, dan Fadillah Budiono)”, Skripsi, (Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia)
[8] Muljiono, Wahju. 2012. Teori dan Praktek Peradilan Perdata di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
[9] Sarwono. 2012. Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[10] Bintania Aris. 2012. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
[11] Mulyadi, Lilik. 2000. Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bandung: Alumni.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-10-02
How to Cite
Maulana, I., & Waluyo. (2023). JURIDICAL REVIEW RETURN OF PERSONAL PROPERTY PROPERTY AGAINST CONVICTED CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION. JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research), 8(2), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.35457/josar.v8i2.2740
Section
Articles