PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MICOM P643 DIFFERENTIAL RELAY ON TRANSFORMER IV OF SEGOROMADU SUBSTATION USING ETAP 21.0.1 SIMULATION

ANALISIS KINERJA RELAI DIFFERENTIAL MICOM P643 PADA TRAFO IV GARDU INDUK SEGOROMADU MENGGUNAKAN SIMULASI ETAP 21.0.1

Authors

  • Andi Wijaya Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Sagita Rochman University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Mohamad Ilham University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35457/quateknika.v16i02.5744

Keywords:

Power transformer, differential relay, power system protection, differential current, ETAP

Abstract

 This study evaluates the differential relay settings of Transformer IV at Segoromadu Substation to ensure reliable transformer protection. The analysis involves manual calculations of transformer nominal current, current transformer (CT) ratio, differential current, restraining current, and relay slope. The results are compared with the existing relay settings and verified through simulations using ETAP 21.0.1. The findings indicate that the existing pickup setting of 0.3 p.u. is appropriate based on the manual calculations. Furthermore, the simulation results demonstrate that the differential relay operates rapidly and selectively, with a trip time of less than 100 ms during internal faults. The relay remains stable during external faults outside the protection zone, confirming its ability to distinguish internal faults from external disturbances and support reliable transformer protection. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Sagita Rochman, University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

    Electrical engineering

  • Mohamad Ilham, University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

    Electrical engineering

References

[1] I. M. Dwi Cahyadi Jaya, I. G. Dyana Arjana, and A. A. G. Maharta Pemayun, “STUDI KOORDINASI KERJA RELE DIFERENSIAL DAN RELE RESTRICTED EARTH FAULT SETELAH UPRATING PADA TRANSFORMATOR II DI GI KAPAL,” Jurnal SPEKTRUM, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 49, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.24843/SPEKTRUM.2018.v05.i01.p07.

[2] D. Bejmert, M. Kereit, F. Mieske, W. Rebizant, K. Solak, and A. Wiszniewski, “Power transformer differential protection with integral approach,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 118, p. 105859, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105859.

[3] E. Ali, O. P. Malik, A. Knight, S. Abdelkader, A. Helal, and H. Desouki, “Ratios-based universal differential protection algorithm for power transformer,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 186, p. 106383, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106383.

[4] E. Ali, A. Helal, H. Desouki, K. Shebl, S. Abdelkader, and O. P. Malik, “Power transformer differential protection using current and voltage ratios,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 154, pp. 140–150, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2017.08.026.

[5] B. Ahmadzadeh-Shooshtari and A. Rezaei-Zare, “Analysis of transformer differential protection performance under geomagnetically induced current conditions,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 194, p. 107094, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107094.

[6] D. Võ Tiến, “MODELING OF RELAY PROTECTION OF ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM USING MATLAB/SIMULINK,” Vietnam J. Sci. Technol., Mar. 2024, doi: 10.15625/2525-2518/18250.

[7] R. Bouderbala and H. Bentarzi, “A New Differential Relay Framework for Power Transformer,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 492, pp. 426–430, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.492.426.

[8] C. Nagarajan, G. Neelakrishnan, R. Janani, S. Maithili, and G. Ramya, “Investigation on Fault Analysis for Power Transformers Using Adaptive Differential Relay,” Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.51983/ajes-2022.11.1.3212.

[9] G. Altama, M. Y. Mustar, R. Syahputra, and T. I. Prasetyo, “Evaluation of Differential Protection in a Main Power Transformer: A Case Study in PT Pertamina Geothermal Energy Area of Kamojang,” Journal of Electrical Technology UMY, vol. 3, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.18196/jet.3256.

[10] J. Belikov and Y. Levron, “Comparison of time-varying phasor and dq 0 dynamic models for large transmission networks,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 93, pp. 65–74, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.05.017.

[11] S. A. Bessedik and H. Hadi, “Prediction of flashover voltage of insulators using least squares support vector machine with particle swarm optimisation,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 104, pp. 87–92, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2013.06.013.

[12] S. Sravan Kumar V. and T. Dhadbanjan, “State estimation in power systems using linear model infinity norm‐based trust region approach,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 500–510, May 2013, doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0473.

Published

2026-10-16

How to Cite

Wijaya, A., Rochman, S., & Ilham, M. (2026). PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MICOM P643 DIFFERENTIAL RELAY ON TRANSFORMER IV OF SEGOROMADU SUBSTATION USING ETAP 21.0.1 SIMULATION: ANALISIS KINERJA RELAI DIFFERENTIAL MICOM P643 PADA TRAFO IV GARDU INDUK SEGOROMADU MENGGUNAKAN SIMULASI ETAP 21.0.1. Jurnal Qua Teknika, 16(02), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.35457/quateknika.v16i02.5744