Pembelajaran Menulis Puisi dengan Pendekatan Metode Karya Wisata bagi Siswa MTsM Padang Panjang

  • Novelti Novelti Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Laila Fitri Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Erpidawati Erpidawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Abstract views: 41 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 36
Keywords: Kuantitatif; Populasi; Sampel

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh penggunaan metode karya wisata terhadap kemampuan menulis puisi siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif menggunakan metode eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini merupakan siswa kelas VIII MTsM Padangpanjang yang terdaftar pada tahun ajaran 2022/2023. Penelitian ini menetapkan sampel sebanyak satu kelas dari keseluruhan populasi. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas VIII A yang diberi perlakuan metode karya wisata. Penetapan sampel dilaksanakan dengan cara purposive sampling yakni dengan pertimbangan dan keperluan tertentu. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan tes unjuk kerja menulis puisi. Untuk menentukan pengaruh sekaligus menguji hipotesis digunakan  rumus uji-t.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: pertama, rata-rata hitung keterampilan menulis puisi siswa sebelum menggunakan metode karya wisata dengan nilai 83,64. Kedua, rata-rata hitung keterampilan menulis puisi setelah menggunakan metode karya wisata dengan nilai 90,76. Hal ini dikarenakan setelah menggunakan metode karya wisata memudahkan siswa untuk menulis puisi sesuai dengan keorisinilan ide, diksi, persajakan, dan bahasa kiasan yang baik. Ketiga, terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penerapan metode karya wisata dalam  menulis puisi siswa dengan taraf signifikansi 0,05 dan derajat kebebasan n-2 (17-2= 15). Dengan demikian, Ho ditolak Ha diterima, karena hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa t hitung> t table (8,59> 2,13).  Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa penggunaan metode karya wisata berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan menulis puisi siswa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Deepa and M. Ilankumaran, “Targeting Communicative Competence Through Poetry as a Tool,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2S3, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.B1013.0782S319.

C. Thatcher, “Cowgirl poetics: Writing women in rodeo,” Text Spec. issue, no. 67, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: ISSN: 1327-9556 | textjournal.scholasticahq.com.

A. Efendi and R. Nurjanah, “Literary learning for teenager inmates in institute for children special rehabilitation,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 411–425, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.21831/cp.v38i3.27322.

M. Browarczyk, “‘If I return this time I must return greater...,’” Cracow Indol. Stud., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19–54, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.12797/CIS.22.2020.01.02.

E. Bravo, E. Costillo, J. L. Bravo, V. Mellado, and M. del C. Conde, “Analysis of prospective early childhood education teachers’ proposals of nature field trips: An educational experience to bring nature close during this stage,” Sci. Educ., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 172–198, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1002/sce.21689.

H. Uppin and I. Timoštšuk, “Teaching in a natural history museum: what can we learn from Estonian elementary school teachers?,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1159–1192, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11422-022-10138-z.

P. N. McDaniel, “Teaching, Learning, and Exploring the Geography of North America with Virtual Globes and Geovisual Narratives,” J. Geog., vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 125–140, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00221341.2022.2119597.

Y. N. Demssie, H. J. A. Biemans, R. Wesselink, and M. Mulder, “Fostering students’ systems thinking competence for sustainability by using multiple real-world learning approaches,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 261–286, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2022.2141692.

W.-H. Lee, C. Kim, H. Kim, H.-S. Kim, and C. Lim, “Students’ Reactions to Virtual Geological Field Trip to Baengnyeong Island, South Korea,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 799, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijgi10120799.

Y. Demir and S. Şenyurt, “Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinde Veli Eşliğinde Gerçekleştirilen İnceleme Gezilerinin Etkililiği,” Milli Eğitim Derg., vol. 51, no. 236, pp. 3001–3030, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.37669/milliegitim.954370.

S. Katz, “In the Beginning Was Observing,” Asian Stud., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 333–352, May 2022, doi: 10.4312/as.2022.10.2.333-352.

F.-Y. Liao, “The relationship between L2 students’ writing experiences and their perceived poetry writing ability,” Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 619–647, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.4.4.

P. D. Long and N. T. Nga, “Students’ Evaluation on Field Trips as a Means to Prepare Graduate Employability at a Vietnamese University,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Lett., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 198–212, May 2022, doi: 10.18488/73.v10i2.3011.

C. L.-Ş. A. Öztuna-Kaplan, “A study on improving the awareness of science teachers about out-of-school learning,” Particip. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 250–269, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.17275/per.22.89.9.4.

M. G. R. Kristiantari, I. W. Widiana, and G. Artawan, “Enhancing the ability to write poetry and creative thinking skills with rural nature-inspired contextual approach,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 761–770, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23194.

E. Martin-Ortega and A. August-Zarebska, “Poesía infantil sefardí: de la tradición oral a las canciones de cuna contemporáneas,” Ocnos. Rev. Estud. sobre Lect., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 50–59, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.2.1376.

S. C. Foo and K. K. Foo, “Purposeful Field Trip: Impact on Experiential Learning Opportunities and Critical Thinking Skills,” Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 30, no. 1, p. Preprint, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.47836/pjssh.30.1.01.

E. Collyer, “Exercising the poetic muscle: A creative practice research method,” Text Spec. Issues, no. 64, pp. 0–20, 2021, doi: 1327-9556 | https://textjournal.scholasticahq.com/.

F.-Y. Liao, “Prospective ESL/EFL Teachers’ Perceptions towards Writing Poetry in a Second Language: Difficulty, Value, Emotion, and Attitude,” Eurasian J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.32601/ejal.460583.

M. S. Kozić and D. D. Trivic, “The waterworks: a context for understanding chemistry concepts in the seventh grade of primary school,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 21, no. 6A, pp. 1165–1180, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.33225/jbse/22.21.1165.

M. B. Garcia, L. S. Nadelson, and A. Yeh, “‘We’re going on a virtual trip!’: a switching-replications experiment of 360-degree videos as a physical field trip alternative in primary education,” Int. J. Child Care Educ. Policy, vol. 17, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40723-023-00110-x.

K. T. Konecki, “Creative Thinking in Qualitative Research and Analysis,” Qual. Sociol. Rev., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 6–25, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.18778/1733-8077.15.3.01.

V. Iasha, M. Japar, A. Maksum, Y. E. Y. Siregar, B. Setiawan, and A. Andayani, “Increasing students’ culture literacy using virtual reality field trip model: Need analysis,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 3263–3276, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i9.8002.

Y. Kırkgöz, “Exploring Poems to Promote Language Learners’ Creative Writing,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 158, pp. 394–401, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.106.

S. Lazarus, “Demonstrating the Therapeutic Values of Poetry in Doctoral Research: Autoethnographic Steps from the Enchanted Forest to a PhD by Publication Path,” Methodol. Innov., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 205979912110220, May 2021, doi: 10.1177/20597991211022014.

T. S. O’Brien, “‘Die Grenzen des Sagbaren’: H. G. Adler (on) Writing Literature after the Holocaust,” Humanities, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 63, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/h10020063.

J. I. Gómez López, “Jack London, the socialist dream of a young poet,” Rev. Estud. Norteam., vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 93–112, 2020, doi: 10.12795/REN.2020.i24.05.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2025-02-06
How to Cite
Novelti, N., Fitri, L., & Erpidawati, E. (2025). Pembelajaran Menulis Puisi dengan Pendekatan Metode Karya Wisata bagi Siswa MTsM Padang Panjang. Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 17(1), 180-194. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v17i1.3700