Risk Management in Slickline Fishing Operations: a Delphi Study
Abstract
Slickline fishing, as a result of undesired event, is economically preferable compared to workover. However, the fact that it does not always end with success but also worsened situation making it a risk management strategy. This research aims to manage the risk during normal slickline to avoid fish and while performing fishing operations using three-round Delphi study to conduct risk identification and to determine countermeasures by asking panel of selected experts. The results revealed that nine risks to be prioritized in Slickline operations to avoid fishing situation and four less prioritized risks to be considered. It has also revealed that 12 risks to be prioritized during fishing operations to avoid ending up in worse situation and five prioritized risks to be considered. The Delphi reached consensus on 12 countermeasures to be prioritized in Slickline operations to avoid fishing situation and 14 important factors for successful fishing operations.
Downloads
References
Aven, T., & Vinem, J. (2007). Risk management with applications from the offshore petroleum industry. London: Springer-Verlag.
Baumann, S., Erber, I., & Gattringer, M. (2016). Selection of Risk Identification Instruments. Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives 5.2, 27-41.
Colton, S., & Hatcher, T. (2004). The Web-Based Delphi Research Technique as a Method for Content Validation in HRD and Adult Education Research. Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference (pp. 183-189). Austin: AHRD.
DeGeare, J. P. (2014). The Guide to Oilwell Fishing Operations, 2nd Edition. Gulf Professional Publishing. Journal of Sustainable Development 4(2): 16-32.
EHS Insight Resources. (2019). The Four Steps of Job Safety Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ehsinsight.com/blog/the-four-steps-of-job-safety-analysis-jsa-examples
Giannarakis, G., Nikolaos, L. & Theotokas, I. (2011). A Delphi Study to Identify Corporate Social Responsibility Indicators: The Case of Greek Telecommunication Sector
Giannarou, L., & Zervas, E. (2014). Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice. Int. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, Volume 9, Issue 2, 66-82.
Gotay, J. A. (2020). A Classical Delphi Study to Identify the Barriers of Green Information Technologies. Open Science Journal 5(3).
Hefferan, M., & Wardner, P. (2012). New Firms---Od Assets: Using Delphi Technique to Identify Accommodation Priorities for Knowledge-intensive Firms. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 14(4), 202-213.
International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Risk Management — Risk Assessment Techniques.
Jones, D., Day, J., & Quadri, D. (2013). Emerging Definitions of Boutique and Lifestyle Hotels: A Delphi Study. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 715-731.
Kim, J., Lee, Worlsook, L. & Lee, S. H. (2020), A Systematic Review of the Guidelines and Delphi Study for the Multifactorial Fall Risk Assessment of Community-Dwelling Elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Heath, 17(17), 6097.
Lamm, K. W., Randall, N. L., Diez-Gonzalez, F. (2020). Critical Food Safety Issues Facing the Food Industry: A Delphi Analysis. Journal of Food Protection.
Markmann, C., Darkow, I.-L., & von der Gracht, H. (2013). A Delphi-based risk analysis — Identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1815-1833.
Nurek, M. Rayner, C., Freyer, A., Taylor, S., Järte, L., MacDermott, N., & Delaney, B. C. (2021). Recommendations for the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Management of Long COVID: a Delphi study British Journal of General Practice; 71 (712): e815-e825.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2002). Job Hazard Analysis.
Post, A., Rannikmäe, M., & Holbrook, J. (2011). Stakeholder views on attributes of scientific literacy important for future citizens and employees - a Delphi study. Science Education Journal Vol. 22, 202-217.
Proag, S. L., & Proag, V. (2014). A Framework of Risk Assessment. 4th International Conference on Building Resilience (pp. 206-213). Salford Quays: Elsevier B. V.
Renault, B., Agumba, J., & Ansary, N. (2016). A Theoretical Review of Risk Identification: Perspective of Construction Industry. Procs 5th Applied Research Conference in Africa (pp. 773-782). Cape Coast: ARCA.
Shi, C., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Li, P., & Zhu, H. (2020). Using the Delphi Method to Identify Risk Factors Contributing to Adverse Events in Residential Aged Care Facilities. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 4;13, 523-537.
Symanowitz, G. (2020, February). Why I banned Brainstorming. Finweek.
Trujillo, J.C, Vincent, J., & Robertson, N. (2010). Application of Heavy-duty Wireline Fishing Tools and Techniques Solves Complex Problem and Restores Well to Production. SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition. Texas: SPE.
van der Linde, H., Hofstad, C., van Limbeek, J., Postema, K., & Geertzen, J. (2005). Use of the Delphi Technique for developing national clinical guidelines for prescription of lower-limb prostheses. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 693-704.
Van de Linde, E., & van der Duin, P. (2011). The Delphi Method as Early Warning: Linking Global Societal Trends to Future Radicalization and Terrorism in The Netherlands. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 78,9, 1557-1564.
van Valin, S. (2014, February). Brainstorming - here are the five rules. Retrieved from Leadership and Excellence.
Vinnem, J.-E. (2014). Offshore Risk Assessment Vol.1, 3rd Edition. London: Springer-Verlag.
Weatherford. (2003). Wireline Operations Manual. Weatherford.
Copyright (c) 2022 JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
