ANALISIS DIVERSIFIKASI PRODUK OLAHAN SALAK WEDI MENGUNAKAN METODE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT(QFD) DAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

ANALISIS DIVERSIFIKASI PRODUK OLAHAN SALAK WEDI MENGUNAKAN METODE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT(QFD) DAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

  • moh yusuf dawud khakim universitas Bojonegoro
  • Darsan Darsan Universitas Bojonegoro
Abstract views: 16 , PDF downloads: 4
Keywords: Keywords: QFD, AHP, Salak Wedi bean coffee

Abstract

The result of this research is the objective of consumer satisfaction, almost all the attributes of Processed Coffee Beans Salak Wedi have outperformed its competitors, except for the attributes of the product packaging size which is compact and proportional, this will increase the value of sales and technical points. response as a long-term strategy, so that the value of priority contributions is increased and taken into account. Meanwhile, the value of the priority contribution of customer needs is the answer to the technical response to improvements that must be made by the Salak Wedi coffee bean home industry. There are 5 priority actions in accordance with the recommendations from the priority data processing of contribution value. The results of AHP analysis show the conclusion that the most appropriate alternative strategy for the home industry of Salak Wedi bean coffee is a product differentiation strategy with a focus on the company's competitive advantage. Attention to Marketing Costs still needs to be done for the purpose of process efficiency by removing waste and potential waste from the production process. Of course, a focus on eliminating waste will have a positive impact on improving product quality, functionality and reliability. However, Marketing Cost in this context is not part of a competitive strategy but is an improvement process for companies to increase their competitive advantage in facing current market competition.

 

 

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
B&D. (2017, Mar 07). Retrieved from http://www.bambangdjaja.com/eng/home/.
B&D Transformer. (2017). www.bambangdjaja.com/material_training/technical.html. Retrieved from www.bambangdjaja.com.
Barlett, J., & Kotrlik, J. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, Vol. 19 (1), p. 43.
Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic Decision Making, Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In T. L. Saaty, Strategic Decision Making. New York: Springer, http://www.springer.com.
Cohen, L. (1995). Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You. Massachusetts: Addison - Wesley Longman.
David, F. (2011). Strategic Management, CONCEPTS AND CASES. New Jersey: 13th Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall.
De Felice, F., & Petrillo, A. (2010). A multiple choice decision analysis: an integrated QFD – AHP model for the assessment of customer needs. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 9, 2010, pp. 25-38.
EW Abryandoko (2019). Studi Penerepan Value Stream Mapping untuk Mengurangi Pemborosan pada Proses Suplay Chain (Studi Kasus di Home Industry Batu Bata Merah di Desa Ledok Kulon Kabupaten Bojonegoro). Penerbit IENACO (Industrial Engineering National Conference) 7 2019
Eldin, N. (2002). A Promoting Planning Tool: Quality Function Deployment. Cost Engineering, Vol 44 no 3.
Fahey, L. (1999). Competitor Analysis: Out Witting, Out Maneuvering, and Out Performing. New York City: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-471-29562-4.
Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Theory and Methodology Aggregating Individual Judgments and Priorities with the Analysis Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 108 : 165-169.
Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
IEC. (2013). IEC 60076 an International Standard. Geneva Swizerland: International Electrotechnical commission.
Nasution, M. (2001). Manajemen Mutu Terpadu. Jakarta: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
Ocampo, L., & Clark, E. (2014). An AHP-MOLP Approach on Prioritizing Competitive Strategies Toward Sustainable Business. International of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJEM), Vol.5, No.2, pp. 95-106 ISSN 2217-2661.
Peniwati, K., & Forman, E. (1998). Theory and Methodology Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108: 165-169.
Porter, M. (1980). COMPETITIVE STRATEGY: Technique for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York City: The Free Press, Simon Schuster Inc., 1230 Avenue.
Porter, M. (1987, May). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, p. p. 65.
Saaty, T. (1993). Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin: Proses Hirarki Analitik Untuk Pengambilan Keputusan yang Kompleks. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Binama Pressindo.
Shafer, D., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Beginning Statistics (V.1.0). Charlotte: University of North Carolina Publishing.
Solimun, Rinaldo, A. A., & Handoyo, S. (2017). Perencanaan dan Pengujian Kuisioner Serta Transformasi Skor Menjadi Skala Berbasis MSI, SRS, dan Rasch Model. Malang: Program Studi Statistika Jurusan Matematika, FMIPA, Univ. Brawijaya.
Suryadi, K., & Ramdani, M. (1998). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosyda Karya.
Team FME. (2013). Porter's Five Forces, Strategy Skills. Retrieved from www.freemanagement-ebooks.com.
Wang, M., Liu, P., & Ou, G. (2007). The Evaluation Study of Customer Satisfaction Based on Gray-AHP Method for B2C Electronic-Commerce Enterprise. Engineering Letters, 15:1, EL_15_1_24.
Wijaya, T. (2011). MANAJEMEN KUALITAS JASA, Desain Servqual, QFD, dan Kano: Disertai Contoh Aplikasi dalam Kasus Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. INDEKS.
Zeithaml, V., & Bitner, M. (1990). Service Marketing. Ney Jersey: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Published
2020-11-18
How to Cite
khakim, moh yusuf dawud, & Darsan , D. (2020). ANALISIS DIVERSIFIKASI PRODUK OLAHAN SALAK WEDI MENGUNAKAN METODE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT(QFD) DAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP): ANALISIS DIVERSIFIKASI PRODUK OLAHAN SALAK WEDI MENGUNAKAN METODE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT(QFD) DAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP). VIABEL: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 14(2), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.35457/viabel.v14i2.1233