DIFFERENCES BETWEEN POSTAL AND STAGE CAGE FOR PEKING DUCKS PERFORMANCE
Abstract views: 112
,
pdf downloads: 95
Abstract
This study conducted to determine the differences of Postal cage and Stage cage on the performance of Peking Duck in Body Weight, feed conversion, and mortality. The material used in the study was 600 Peking ducks were raised separately in postal cage and stage cage with common diet from DOD (Days Old Duck) to 35 day of age. This research was a quantitative descriptive research that interpreted data from research samples, analyzed by student T test that is used to compare the means of two groups that is Peking ducklings were raised in postal cage and stage cage. The results showed that the Body Weight, FCR, and Mortality of Peking Ducks were reared in Postal Cage is 1,54, 1,94 and 1,5% while the ducks that were kept in Stage Cage is 1.53, 1,95 and 2,5%. The results indicated that there was no difference in the performance (Body weight, FCR, and Mortality) of Peking ducks housed in postal and stage cage. However, based on the average values for body weight, FCR, and mortality, the postal cage provides the best results.
References
[2] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2023. Production of Manila Duck/Duck Meat According to Provincial Data (ton), 2020-2022. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.
[3] Bai, H., Yang, B., Dong, Z., Li, X., Song, Q., Jiang, Y., Chang, G., and Chen G. 2022. Research Note: Effects of Cage and Floor Rearing Systems on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, and Meat Quality in Small-Sized Meat Ducks. Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China. Poultry Science 101:101520
[4] Brata, B., Soetrisno, E., Sucahyo, T., & Setiawan, B. D. (2020). Patterns of duck population, maintenance management and marketing (a case study in Pematang Balam Village, Hulu Palik District, North Bengkulu Regency). Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 15(1), 98-109.
[5] Eratalar, Sabri Ada. (2021). The Effect of Plastic Slatted Floor and A Deep-litter System on The Growth Performance of Hybrid Peking Ducks. Arch. Anim. Breed., 64(1), 1-6.
[6] Fenita, Y., Santoso, U., dan Prakoso, H., 2010. Pengaruh suplementasi asam amino lisin, metionin, tritopan dalam ransum berbasis lumpur sawit fermentasi terhadap performans produksi dan kualitas telur ayam ras. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia. 5(2): 105-114.
[7] Ismoyowati., Indrasanti, D., dan Sulistyawan, I.H., 2018. The Differences of feed quality and egg production performance of Tegal and Magelang ducks on farming in central. Buletin Peternakan. 42(3): 197-202.
[8] Kunharjanti, A. W. dan Sujani, E. T. 2016. Pengaruh Perbedaan Kandang terhadap Produktifitas Ayam Petelur Fase Grower. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Islam Balitar. Blitar. Jurnal Aves Vol. 10 (2) 41-49.
[9] Liu, J. B., Yan, H. L., Zhang, Y., Hu, Y. D., and Zhang H. F. 2019. Effects of Dietary Energy and Protein Content and Lipid Source on Growth Performance and Carcass Traits in Peking Ducks. School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan. China. Poultry Science 98:4829–4837.
[10] Mesa, D., Muniz, E., Souza, A., & Geffroy, B. (2017). Broiler-housing conditions affect the performance. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 19, 263-272.
[11] National Research Council. (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press. Washington D. C.
[12] Nova, K. (2017). PPerformance of Medium-Type Rooster Fed Different Dietary Ratios During the Day and Night. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian.
[13] Nova, K., Riyanti, R., Septinova, D., & Santosa, P. E. (2019). The Percentage Difference of Day and Night Diet Feeding on the Performance of Medium-Type Rooster in Postal Cages. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 7(3), 263-269.
[14] Nurlaelah, S., Rahmaniar, Y., Nirmayanti, D., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Contribution of Buras Chicken and Influencing Factors on Purchase Decisions at the "Bebek Gazebo" Restaurant in Makassar. Media Agribisnis, 6(2), 183-194.
[15] Risnajati, D. (2012). Comparison of the final weight, carcass weight, and carcass percentages of different broiler strains. Sains Peternakan: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Peternakan, 10(1), 11-14.
[16] Siregar, A.P., dan Sabrani. 2005. Techniques for Raising Broiler in Indonesia. Magie Group. Jakarta.
[17] Tamalluddin, F. (2014). Complete Guide for Broiler Chicken. Penebar Swadaya Grup.
[18] Taufik, M., Sulaiman, A., & Habibah, H. (2023). Utilization of Bread Waste as an Energy Source in the Ratio of Peking Ducks' Final Weight, Carcass Percentage, Abdominal Fat Percentage, and IOFC. Jurnal Penelitian Peternakan Lahan Basah, 3(1), 47-56.
Copyright (c) 2023 JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
