EVALUASI KINERJA PERSIMPANGAN BERSINYAL (STUDI KASUS JL. SIMPANG SULFAT UTARA – JL. SIMPANG SULFAT SELATAN – JL. TERUSAN SULFAT – JL. RAYA SULFAT)

  • Rifky Aldila Primasworo Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi
  • Blima Oktaviastuti
  • Delan Efri Aldo
Abstract views: 19 , PDF downloads: 15
Keywords: Signalized Intersection, Performance, Evaluation, Prediction, Solution.

Abstract

An intersection is a place that turns or branches from a straight line. Crossroads with signals, namely road users who pass through the intersection in accordance with the operation of the traffic signal. The sulphate signaled intersection has a high density level as a result of the heavy traffic volume and does not match the road capacity in Belimbing sub-district, Malang city. The research method is by field observation or data collection where the researcher records information through direct events that are being witnessed during the research, one of which is a traffic volume survey conducted using the average traffic survey (LHR) method. The average daily traffic survey is carried out for one week from Monday - Sunday, where the length of observation is 16 hours starting from 06:00 - 22:00 WIB. The evaluation results at the sulphate-signaled intersection show that the degree of saturation of the morning peak hours on each approach is 0.98 North, 1.38 South, 1.79 East and has exceeded the DS value required in the 1997 MKJI, namely 0.75. While the DS value in the Western approach is 0.71 and has met the DS value required in the 1997 MKJI. The predicted results of the sulfate signalized intersection in the 10th year show that the DS value in each approach is 1.10 North, 1.51 South, East 1.78 and West 1.08 and greatly exceeds the DS value in the 1997 MKJI which is 0.75. Changes in WINS, WLETS and making a direct left turn and redesigning cycle times are alternative solutions that are proven to increase the level of service at the intersection from F (obstructed current) to C (stable flow).

References

F. D. Hoobs, “Perencanaan dan Teknik Lalu Lintas. Diterjemahkan oleh Suprapto TM dan Waldijino.” Gajah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta. Hal, 1995.

C. J. Khisty and B. K. Lall, “Dasar-dasar rekayasa transportasi,” Erlangga, Jakarta, 2005.

M. E. T. Inna, “STUDI PENGENDALIAN KINERJA SIMPANG BERSINYAL (STUDI KASUS SIMPANG EMPAT JALAN SIMPANG SULFAT UTARA–JALAN SIMPANG SULFAT SELATAN-JALAN TERUSAN SULFAT–JALAN RAYA SULFAT).” ITN Malang, 2018.

R. H. Waas, “Analisis Prediksi Kinerja Simpang Bersinyal Dalam Kondisi Eksisting Dan 5 Tahun Kedepan Pada Ruas Jalan Rijali Untuk Mendapatkan Solusi Manajemen Lalu Lintas Yang Optimal,” Manumata J. Ilmu Tek., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 38–46, 2018.

B. P. S. K. Malang, “Kota Malang dalam Angka 2016,” BPS Provinsi Jawa Timur. Tersedia di www. jatim. bps. go. id, diakses pada, vol. 1, 2017.

S. Malkhamah, “Survei, Lampu Lalulintas, dan Pengantar Manajemen Lalulintas (Edisi ketiga).” Biro Penerbit. KMTS FT UGM, 1996.

O. Z. Tamin, “Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi: Contoh soal dan aplikasi,” Bandung ITB, 2003.

C. H. Oglesby and R. G. Hicks, “Teknik Jalan Raya Jilid 1,” Erlangga, Jakarta, 1999.

A. Aashto, “Policy on geometric design of highways and streets,” Am. Assoc. State Highw. Transp. Off. Washington, DC, vol. 1, no. 990, p. 158, 2001.

A. Andriyanto, E. I. Imananto, and A. Ma’ruf, “EVALUASI KINERJA SIMPANG PADA PERSIMPANGAN BERSINYAL JL. ASEMBAGUS–JL. SERUNI KABUPATEN SITUBONDO,” STUDENT J. GELAGAR, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2020.

Published
2022-03-16
How to Cite
Rifky Aldila Primasworo , R. A. P., Blima Oktaviastuti , B. O., & Delan Efri Aldo , D. E. A. (2022). EVALUASI KINERJA PERSIMPANGAN BERSINYAL (STUDI KASUS JL. SIMPANG SULFAT UTARA – JL. SIMPANG SULFAT SELATAN – JL. TERUSAN SULFAT – JL. RAYA SULFAT). Jurnal Qua Teknika, 12(01), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.35457/quateknika.v12i01.2086